Tobacco products bring in tax dollars, they will never be outlawed. Jim
C Creel wrote:
Dear Bob, You said: <<Right on. With all the evidence on tobacco why weren't the tobacco companies treated the same way. They are allowed to pay damages and raise their prices to get it back. Knowing that their addict customers will still be there. I'm not an advocate of Seasilver. I just believe in equal treatment.>> ** This is really not relevant. I agree with what you say about things that are allowed to exist that are harmful to people, but we're not talking about a substance here that is necessarily harmful (Sea Silver), we're talking about a company misrepresenting a product. There are plenty of other examples we can come up with like this - for instance, the pharmaceutical industry. But this doesn't mean that everything sahould be overlooked because some things are. My biggest issue with Sea Silver is not it's poor performance, it's that the company repeatedly refused to divulge the amounts of the various nutrients they claim are in their product. I called numerous times letting them know that I had a client base of hundreds of people who take my recommendations seriously. They claimed that because it is "all natural" the amounts vary. I suggested that they must have done some tests on the product that showed ingredients and the range of amounts of each. They admitted they did but again refused to divulge this. Not everyone is as insistent on details as I am. So who knows what others who use this product are getting. They could be paying $40 for a bottle that contains no more nutrients than a Flintstone's vitamin. Regards, Catherine -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>