How about ... for experimental purposes only ?
Arnold Beland wrote: > > Marshall, > > "if I did > not remove any reference to anything true about CS, I would be fined > $10,000 a > day." > > Does this mean that you would be OK with them if you used "qualifying > phrases" such as "it is widely believed" and so on? > > Arnold > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marshall Dudley" <mdud...@execonn.com> > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 5:30 PM > Subject: Re: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver > > > Or maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer that has the > notion that the > > Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my site approved > by an attorney > > and doctor who said that there was nothing illegal on it and the > government could > > not do anything about it, only to get a letter from the FTC saying > that if I did > > not remove any reference to anything true about CS, I would be fined > $10,000 a > > day. > > > > Marshall > > > > jrowl...@nctimes.net wrote: > > > > > > Do you imply that this may have been a set-up for a precedent to > get others? > > > No, my first thought was maybe Seasilver, for whatever reason, > WANTS to > > > be a > > > test-case, as they were clearly warned and there's very big bucks > > > involved. > > > So far, it just does not make sense, especially to the 400+ > laid-off > > > employees. > > > A publicity stunt? Puzzling. This geographic area is also home > to some > > > major players in pharms and gene research. > > > jr > > > > > > -- > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal > silver. > > > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: > http://silverlist.org > > > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > > > > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
