Mike Monett wrote: > > 2H2O2 then reacts with the Ag2O producing 2Ag and O2 and H2O. The > > 2Ag are monatomic but form a Cooper pair between them, > > A Cooper pair requires charged particles in a superconducting medium > that strain the nearby lattice. Besides the fact your previous > analysis was incorrect, silver atoms carry no charge and thus cannot > form a Cooper pair. Also, this effect requires tempoerature at or > below liquid nitrogen, which means the water would be frozen solid. > Pure frozen dw is nonconductive, and none of the noble metals are > superconductors.
That is one way to form Cooper pairs, but not necessarily the only way. ORME substances are believed by some researchers to get their odd physical characteristics from Cooper pairs at room temperature. See: http://www.halexandria.org/dward466.htm http://www.halexandria.org/dward479.htm http://www.geocities.com/Athens/3775/alchemy3.html http://www.gctspace.com/theory/superc.html > > > > and the group of all the monoatomic silver atoms form a > > distributed Bose-Einstein Condensate. > > This occurs only a temperatures within a millionth of a degree or so > from absolute zero. Not your average home environment. Some of the above references talk about this as well. I do not know if they are correct, but they do lend support to that theory. > > > > This results in a form of superconductivity on a small scale, > > Nope. > > > which would increase the catalytic and electron donation > > capability of silver by a huge amount. > > Nope. Not even related. Only ions have any biological activity. That is not toally correct. Try drinking kerosene or any hydrocarbon or chloronated solvent, it will make you sick or kill you, but have no ions in them at all. Also, silver plates kill bacteria on contact, this is used in water purification, no ions here. > > > > So what could be happening is that this addition of H2O2 is > > creating monatomic silver, which along with monatomic gold and > > mercury are reported to have unexpected physical and health > > properties. > > I'm sure you do not want to take mercury in any form. True, but it does kill bacteria quite effectively, and was used for centuries for pinkeye and STDs. > As far as > monoatomic silver, from images and analysis on a Kodak site, it > likes to form clusters of 6 atoms or more. I doubt many people have > the equipment needed to determine how many atoms are in a group, and > it would be difficult to prove any benefit is obtained without very > comprehensive analysis. > > > See some of the work by David Hudson on monatomic gold and silver > > properties and benefits for more information on this. > > I did a brief google on Hudson. Sounds like more junk science to me. Could be, but the problem is that quite a few have replicated his findings. Apparent there is something there, if it is junk science, then it is likely the theory that is wrong. I agree that there is insufficient information to support the theory, but then I have not seen any alternative theories that look any better either. Who knows, it took 15 years for the DOE to finally admit that they were wrong about cold fusion being junk science which according to classical theory should be impossible. Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
