Re: CS>basic dumb question
From: Ode Coyote
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:41:17
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m78970.html

  > I've seen the silver smearing off either electrode [should be just
  > one, right?]

  If you  are  talking  about misting, it  can  be  both.  Usually one
  electrode will  have some feature that makes it  different  from the
  other. Such  as length, a cut or burr on the side,  different amount
  of etching and wear from being used as the anode, etc.

  The neat thing is if you can get the reaction to start at a specific
  electrode, the  ions  normally produced at  that  electrode  go into
  making oxides  instead of diffusing to the other  electrode.  So the
  other electrode  doesn't see as many ions and doesn't  make  as much
  oxide.

  I use that principle in my high-uS generator. I split the  cell into
  two rectangular  chambers  separated by a 4  inch  polyethelyne pipe
  with 1/2 inch inside diameter. Each chamber holds 500ml of dw.

  (Here's the diagram. Please use a monospaced font)

    #A Electrode      1/2" pipe              #B electrode
    |                /                       |
  +-|-------------+ /          +-------------|-+
  | |             --------------             | |
  | |             --------------             | |
  | |             |            |             | |
  | | Compartment |            | Compartment | |
  | |             |            |             | |
  | |     "1"     |            |     "2"     | |
  | |             |            |             | |
  | |             |            |             | |
  | |             |            |             | |
  |               |            |               |
  +---------------+            +---------------+

  The theory is the ions in each chamber will tend to stay  there, and
  only a few will go through the pipe to the opposite compartment.

  This requires a very high voltage to supply the current, since there
  are few ions in the pipe to contribute to current flow. In fact, the
  initial resistance  is over 3 megohms. So I use a 330  volt constant
  current source that supplies variable current. Right now I  am using
  755uA. It takes a while to come out of saturation.

  The electrodes are flat 0.999 silver plates 1 inch wide.  The wetted
  length is 4 inches, so each electrode is about 4 square inches. I do
  not count the reverse face since there seems to be relatively little
  current there.

  The magic part is if I get things working right, the silver  ions go
  through the  pipe and enter the opposite chamber. Since  the current
  is so low, many of them reach the cathode and accept an electron and
  plate out  on  the  cathode.

  But this  has  extremely  beneficial   results!  It  means  one less
  hydroxyl ion is created, so the population of hydroxyls is reduced.

  It takes a very slight asymmetry  in electrode length  and placement
  to achieve this. One electrode is slightly longer than the  other. I
  use this for the cathode. The chambers are also slightly different.

  Since there are fewer hydroxyls, the chance of them combining with a
  silver ion  is reduced, so there are more silver ions  to  reach the
  cathode and  take an electron. This process avalanches, and  a point
  is reached  where  few  hydroxyl  ions  are  generated,  and few are
  available to travel to the anode compartment.

  By now  the  ion concentration in the  anode  compartment  is mostly
  silver, with a deficiency of hydroxyl ions.

  But the Hanna is calibrated for equal numbers of silver and hydroxyl
  ions. So in theory, if there were zero hydroxyls, the  Hanna reading
  should be  doubled.  This means a reading of 40uS  actually  means a
  silver ion concentration of 80ppm!

  Of course,  things  never  get  this  good.  But  the  salt  test is
  considerable stronger than would be indicated by the Hanna reading.

  Without more sophisticated (and expensive) equipment, I have  no way
  to tell  what the actual ion concentration is, so I just  go  by the
  PWT reading in uS.

  Now, my  problem is the cell voltage would stalls  during  the brew,
  indicating everything  was going to making oxides or plating  out on
  the cathode.  I found by removing and cleaning  the  electrodes, the
  process would continue and produce very concentrated cs.

  > Anyhow, you  can buy Silver Hydroxide Reagent? and  it's described
  > as a white powder, virtually insoluable in water.

  I think  there's  some mistake. Silver hydroxide  is  black  or dark
  brown. Here's  how  it  is  used   to  make  a  mirrored  flask. The
  instructions say:

  --------------------------------------------------------------------
    "4. While  stirring, add concentrated ammonium  hydroxide dropwise
    to the silver nitrate solution in the beaker until  the gray-black
    silver hydroxide, AgOH, precipitate forms."

    "Continue adding  concentrated  ammonium  hydroxide  dropwise with
    swirling until the silver diammine ionic complex,  Ag(NH3)2+ (aq),
    forms and the solution JUST becomes clear and colorless."

    http://www.flinnsci.com/Documents/demoPDFs/Chemistry/CF10145.pdf
  --------------------------------------------------------------------

  So they  use  the black color of silver hydroxide to  tell  how much
  stuff to add to make it colorless.

  > There is  a white powdery deposit that appears now and  then under
  > certain conditions.

  Yes, I  have seen that also. I don't know what it is. But  much more
  often the deposit that forms is black or dark brown.

  > If the electrodes are very close to the bottom and no  stirring is
  > used, you get that white deposit on one side, a black spot  on the
  > other side under the electrode that turns black and shiny metallic
  > plateout in between.

  > Ode

  I don't  know what the white spot is, but I'm pretty sure  the black
  one is silver hydroxide.

  I haven't put the electrodes that close to the bottom, but  will try
  it next  time  I play. I have seen the shiny  metallic  coat  on the
  sides of  the  glass when using high  current  density.  This always
  formed on  my  first cs generator long ago. A description  is  on my
  Shingles page (caution graphic photos)

    http://www.geocities.com/mrmonett/shingles/0shin.htm

  Silver hydroxide  is  fairly stable but decomposes  around  100C. It
  also decomposes under slight pressure of wiping, which is how it got
  on my  glass.  H2O2 will remove it, but slowly.  H2O2  is  much more
  vigorous on the black oxide - it bubbles and fizzes.

Best Regards,

Mike Monett


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>