Info wrote:

> Mike Monett wrote:
>
>  >  According to Ivan Anderson, Mesosilver is made of oxides. This makes
>  >  sense, since your tan color is similar to diluted silver hydroxide.
>
>   > Elemental silver is gray or black in solution. You can prove this by
>   > adding pickling  salt  to  36uS  cs  to  make  silver  chloride. The
>   > dispersion is white, but it turns dark gray after exposure to light.
>
> And what size particles are creating this color and in what silver
> concentration?
>
>   > Mesosilver is the wrong color to be silver particles.
>
> These words of wisdom are from "scientists" who are using conductivity
> meters to determine silver content, cannot measure particle size, etc... You
> have got to be kidding.
>
> The color of Mesosilver has nothing what so ever to do with the color of
> material the particle is made of as you suggest. Mesosilver absorbs visible
> light at a wavelength of 400 nm. The apparent color is the complement of the
> absorption wavelength. The absorption wavelength, thus the apparent color
> could be made to be any color of the visible spectrum by slightly altering
> the ionic species of the dispersant. Such a minor alteration of the ionic
> species would alter the zeta potential and the thus the dispersion
> properties and in doing so would change the apparent color but not change
> the composition of the particles at all.
>
> When the water is evaporated from Mesosilver what remains is a thin film of
> metallic silver, not silver oxide. This rather easy experiment requires only
> that one be able to recognize metallic silver when one sees it. Fill a 250
> mL beaker half way with Mesosilver, cover to keep dust out, let sit until
> the water evaporates.
>
> As far as e-coli, the results of a properly designed challenge test put the
> lie to Quinto's tests.
>
> When an ionic product is tested using the same challenge protocol, the
> results are barely indistinguishable. Here is a link to a challenge test
> that include Mesosilver at 20.0 ppm and ASAP22 that was measured to be 22.3
> ppm (a silver concentration 11.5% higher than the Mesosilver).
> http://www.silver-colloids.com/Pubs/EMSL/Ecoli2.pdf

I see the experiment was run with agar.  Since mesosilver was effective, I am
assuming that the test temperature of 35 degrees was sufficient to keep the agar
liquid during the test.  Is that correct?

>
>
> ASAP 22 is far superior at killing pathogens compared to Sovereign Silver 10
> ppm because is has more than twice the silver concentration. The test
> clearly indicates that the ASAP 22 produced virtually the same results as
> Mesosilver. Yet Quinto would have us believe from his tests that his 10 ppm
> product works and Mesosilver does nothing. Utter nonsense!

I believe the difference may be that you did your test in a broth (liquified
agar due to temperature), and he did his in a gel. If so the results of both are
quite predictable.  Do you know if I am correct on this?

Marshall

>
>
> The Quinto tests lack the quality required for publication, their usefulness
> being limited to presentation to lay people who can easily be fooled. This
> is the same bogus science that brought us his TEM images of ionic silver.
>
> Frank Key
> Colloidal Science Lab.
> www.colloidalsciencelab.com
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
> OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>