At 10:08 -0400 6/2/04, Bill Cole wrote:Glenn Anderson claims that EIMS 2.2.2 can be totally secured from relay
and since I have no means of testing that claim, I won't challenge it.
No reason to, EIMS is not the server being discussed and it is secure.
Well, opinions on the security of EIMS vary, but that's not the point.
What is the point is that we would very much like to hear specifics on the test being run and the "failure" of the test.
If there is an exploitable relay hole in SIMS it is important to know about it.
SIMS 1.8b+ has always passed every security check I've seen, so please provide more information on this. Specific details of the test in question are enough with enough information for someone else to duplicate your results. You don't have to tell us your server setup, we can certainly duplicate any test conditions.
So far, i have to write this off to a misconfiguration or a confusion of SIMS and EIMS. Even a google search for the error string supposedly return yields nothing.
-- A vote for Nader is a vote for George Bush.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
