On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Klaus Rudolph wrote: > Knut Schwichtenberg schrieb: > > Bill, > > > > William Rivet wrote: > >> I'll just pipe in that I'm currently working on replacing the build > >> system for simulavrxx with something more sane via CMake...thanks to a > >> little nudging by Michael Buesch :-) > > Early this year I tried to build simulavrxx and got it running under > > Linux with ordinary make and without problems. Make was annoying and did > > not change for the last 15 years but GNU make is running under cygwin as > > well as under any *nix. What is the benefit for me as a user of > > simulavrxx in using CMake?
Trying to use the files that came with simulavrxx gave me nothing but trouble. Replacing autotools with something less tricky than plutonium might be a good thing. -- Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those parts of the system that you can hit with a hammer (not advised) are called Hardware; those program instructions that you can only curse at are called Software." _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
