On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Michael N. Moran wrote: > Klaus Rudolph wrote: > > Michael N. Moran schrieb: > >> I understand all sides of the issue ... > >> > >> Software developers (especially embedded software > >> developers) should be comfortable with using make. > >> > >> I hate autotools, however, they are ubiquitous in the > >> free software world, and having yet-another system for > >> accomplishing the same thing (e.g. CMake) does not > >> sound like a "good thing."
I don't know enough about CMAke to know whether it is less tricky than plutonium. > >> > >> OTOH, the one who volunteers to do the work SHOULD get > >> the majority vote :-) > >> > >> > > Lets finish all the discussions... what is actually > > required from the "outside world"? > > A reliable familiar way to build simulavrxx. :-) > > e.g. > 1) unpack (eg tar xzf) > 2) configure (./configure) > 3) make > 4) make install My problems seem to derive from step 1.5) run autotools. IIRC having *the* right version of autotools is essential. I'm pretty sure I didn't, but don't know what to do about it. Instead I've been using a stripped down make file. > > As I said: "My" simulavrxx is running fine on multiple > > unix systems. What is needed from the others??? What can > > I do now to get your problems solved? > > As I understand it, William Rivet is working on > *a* solution, so I don't think you're being asked > to do anything. -- Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those parts of the system that you can hit with a hammer (not advised) are called Hardware; those program instructions that you can only curse at are called Software." _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
