On 21.02.2016 20:48, Thomas K wrote:
To answer Albrechts question about who use simulavr: that's the problem of all - it could be from 5 to thousands ... :-) In normal distributions simulavr package is available - but in version 0.1.2.6! For debian a package maintainer is wanted. I assume, that this is the same for other distributions.
What about adding a feedback function?


On 21.02.2016 20:48, Thomas K wrote:
Hi Klaus,

be relaxed ... :-) Controller with 3 level stack instead of a real stack pointer are obsolete. (as Jörg already wrote) If you look on atmel site this parts are not listed any more. (even the really small tiny's like tiny4/5/9/10 have real stack pointer) Of course you can buy tiny11 and tiny12, for example in reichelt shop. (haven't found tiny15, but maybe you can find it in other shops ...)

But, we haven't this parts in simulavr! Sure, we can implement this parts, but if nobody use it? (that's the question!) In the moment I haven't a problem with that code. It's unused and just dead code! But why maintain this, if not used?

To answer Albrechts question about who use simulavr: that's the problem of all - it could be from 5 to thousands ... :-) In normal distributions simulavr package is available - but in version 0.1.2.6! For debian a package maintainer is wanted. I assume, that this is the same for other distributions.

cu, Thomas


_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel

Reply via email to