How many users of simulavr recently use it (or plan) to simulate
tiny11/12/15 or at90s1200?
Does anybody know, how many people really use simulavr?
On 21.02.2016 08:18, Klaus wrote:
Hi all,
So the question is: is there a need to implement tiny11/12/15?
(at90s1200 is to old, I think) If not, then we should remove this
implementation.
I think they're all obsolete now.
Please do not remove things which are working. There are so many
features dropped in the last years. So please do not drop this
features!!!! I have no idea why killing features is so funny. I
have so much trouble to bring the features later in again. Look
for IRQ which was broken without any sense. The serial interface
was broken, the trace output is still broken. All these things
have worked a long time but are all gone.
So please stop doing that!
Regards
Klaus
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel