Hi Shane,
did become possible, won't the Block argument then
become a serious problem? If you did have infinite computation then you could just build an AIXI and be done. There would be no point in building a different
system that was provably less powerful and yet more complex to construct.
Such a system could find a cure to cancer and rework all known mathematics
and extend it a billion fold in the blink of an eye... but would such a system really be "intelligent"? To me that seems like a completely pointless thing to worry about in the presence of unlimited computation power. It would be like arguing that the plane I went on vacation on wasn't really flying because inside it wasn't being driven by a mechanism that was producing bird poop. For me the important point is that the plane achieves the function of flight. This is what I care about when going on vacation and it's the most useful concept of "flight" to me. The same would be true of intelligence; if it can work out how to cure somebody of cancer and billions of other totally amazing things, in the end that is what I care about. I call it intelligence. If you don't want to, then what I want
to achieve is not what you call intelligence.

I would phrase things a little differently, personally.

I definitely agree with you that "intelligence" should be conceived as having to do with
functionality, not internal structures/dynamics.

However, I don't think that intelligence is the only important goal; it is not the only
thing I want to achieve in creating artificial minds.

There is something, to me, profoundly unaesthetic about systems like AIXI. If I had infinite computing power, I'd rather build an AIXI **plus** some other systems with more aesthetic baggage like self, will, awareness, feeling, etc. The computing power of this combined set of systems would not exceed that of AIXI, but the aesthetic quality
would, according to my own aesthetics ;-)

-- Ben

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=11983

Reply via email to