tom, I think the point is, it seems like you didn't actually read and understand Shane's definition of intelligence...
ben On 5/15/07, Shane Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom, I'm sure any computer scientist worth their salt could > use a computer to write up random ten-billion-byte-long algorithms that would do exactly nothing. Defining intelligence that way because it's mathematically neat is just cheating Let's assume that you can make a very long program that is random and does not do anything. Why is this a problem? Cheers Shane ------------------------------ This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=8eb45b07
