On 10/27/07, Aleksei Riikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. For me to think that "what I would want to be" is 'good', I do not > have to think that I am 'good' right now. > > An AI implementing CEV doesn't question, is the thing that humans > express that they ultimately want, 'good' or not. If it is what the > humans really want, then it is done. No thinking about whether it is > really 'good' (except the thinking done by the humans answering the > questions, and the possible simulations/modifications/whatever of > those humans -- and they indeed think that it *is* 'good').
If that is how CEV is meant to work than I object to CEV and reject it. -- Stefan Pernar 3-E-101 Silver Maple Garden #6 Cai Hong Road, Da Shan Zi Chao Yang District 100015 Beijing P.R. CHINA Mobil: +86 1391 009 1931 Skype: Stefan.Pernar ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=58053158-533496
