On 10/27/07, Aleksei Riikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You seem to have a need to personally give a final answer to "What is
> 'good'?" -- an answer to what moral rules the universe should be
> governed by. If you think that your answer is better than what the
> "surveying" process that CEV is would produce, I think your attitude
> amounts to delusions of grandeur.
I do not want to get into a mud slinging contest with you. Sorry for for
pissing you off - not my intention. To bring the discussion back on a more
fruitful path, may I suggest you point out fallacies in my writings (
www.jame5.com). I think name calling is counter productive.
I find it obvious that whatever answer you give, it isn't better than
> the answer the smarter and more knowledgeable humans, who are surveyed
> in the CEV process, would give. I find it infinitely more preferable
> to find out what they would say ("they" would include wiser versions
> of you and me), instead of taking whatever the current you says as the
> final answer to this question that all the smartest human philosophers
> have tried to solve for all of human history, without coming up with
> an answer that could be considered to settle the issue.
>
I hope you would take a look at my suggested theory before dismissing it.
Would be more than happy to engage in a discussion with you based on mutual
respect.
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Pernar
3-E-101 Silver Maple Garden
#6 Cai Hong Road, Da Shan Zi
Chao Yang District
100015 Beijing
P.R. CHINA
Mobil: +86 1391 009 1931
Skype: Stefan.Pernar
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=58081690-42d0a0
