On 17/02/2008, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanier's rainstorm argument is spurious nonsense.
That's the response of most functionalists, but an explanation as to why it is spurious nonsense is needed. And some such as Hans Moravec have actually conceded that the argument is valid: http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/project.archive/general.articles/1998/SimConEx.98.html -- Stathis Papaioannou ------------------------------------------- singularity Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=96140713-a54b2b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
