Duh! OK. That is what I was missing. Seemed like there had to be something.
Thanks
Brett Tate wrote:
>>there seems to be nothing saying that headers
>>are terminated by CRLF!
>
>
> The message-header definition includes an ending CRLF.
>
> message-header = (...) CRLF
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
