message-header is defined as:

message-header  =  (Accept
                /  Accept-Encoding

[...]

                /  WWW-Authenticate
                /  extension-header) CRLF

CRLF is already present :-)


Paul Kyzivat wrote:

>I was just looking at the bnf in 3261. I may just be addled today, but I 
>think I see a gross error:
>
>there seems to be nothing saying that headers are terminated by CRLF!
>
>Here are some snippets from the syntax:
>
>==============================================================
>Request        =  Request-Line
>                   *( message-header )
>                   CRLF
>                   [ message-body ]
>
>message-header  =  (Accept
>...
>                 /  CSeq
>...
>
>CSeq  =  "CSeq" HCOLON 1*DIGIT LWS Method
>
>Method            =  INVITEm / ACKm / OPTIONSm / BYEm
>                      / CANCELm / REGISTERm
>                      / extension-method
>INVITEm           =  %x49.4E.56.49.54.45 ; INVITE in caps
>extension-method  =  token
>==============================================================
>
>That is enough to see that nothing specifies that there should be a CRLF 
>at the end of each message-header.
>
>Looks to me that the syntax ought to be changed to:
>
>
>==============================================================
>Request        =  Request-Line
>                   *( message-header CRLF)
>                   CRLF
>                   [ message-body ]
>
>Response          =  Status-Line
>                      *( message-header CRLF)
>                      CRLF
>                      [ message-body ]
>==============================================================
>
>What am I missing?
>
>I took a look in bugzilla but didn't find anything.
>
>       Paul
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to