>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sarkar, Uttam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:17 PM
>To: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>[email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>
>I see UPDATE is used before sending 200 OK (for INVITE).  I 
>don't see any re-INVITE scenario here. Am I missing something here?

Yes. Pl. see sec. 13.1, Figure 3.


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:56 PM
>To: Sarkar, Uttam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>[email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>
>I think RFC 3312 has some examples where 18x is needed for 
>preconditions in a mid-call session.
>
>Sanjay.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sarkar, Uttam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:05 PM
>>To: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>>[email protected]
>>Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>>
>>Whole idea of 100rel is to make sure 18X message is received by the 
>>other party so that they can be sure of exchnage any media before 
>>session is established.
>>Re-INVITE is for established session.
>>Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:09 PM
>>To: Sarkar, Uttam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>>[email protected]
>>Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>>
>>It might be useful for QoS cases. 
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>>Of Sarkar,
>>>Uttam
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:28 AM
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>>>
>>>I still can't understand why 100rel is requiring to a
>>re-INVITE (change
>>>media from audio to audio and video).
>>>In the re-INVITE it will carry the new media. Other endpoint will 
>>>respond back with final response (like 200 OK or 488 Not Acceptable 
>>>Here).
>>>I can't imagine other end will send 18X with media and send
>>PRACK for a
>>>session that is already established.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:57 AM
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE
>>>
>>>   From: "Sarkar, Uttam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>   100rel does not make sense in re-INVITE as session is already
>>>   established. UAS is expected to send final response
>>(2XX/4XX/5XX etc
>>>).
>>>   It can send 100 trying to stop retransmission of INVITE while it's
>>>   preparing the final response.
>>>   It's not recommended for UAS to send 1XX response for the
>>re-INVITE.
>>>
>>>One can imagine scenarios where a re-INVITE might not be
>>instantaneous,
>>>and so 100rel might be a useful mechanism.  For instance, if one 
>>>endpoint wishes to upgrade an audio call to an audio-and-video call, 
>>>the other endpoint might want to ask its user before activating the 
>>>video camera.
>>>
>>>Dale
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Sip-implementors mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>>
>>>This email and any attached files herein contain information that is 
>>>intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
>>>addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, 
>>>confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under
>>applicable laws. 
>>>If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any disclosure, 
>>>dissemination, distribution, copying or other use or
>>retention of this
>>>communication or its substance is prohibited.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Sip-implementors mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>>
>>
>>This email and any attached files herein contain information that is 
>>intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
>>addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, 
>>confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under 
>applicable laws. 
>>If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any disclosure, 
>>dissemination, distribution, copying or other use or 
>retention of this 
>>communication or its substance is prohibited.
>>
>
>This email and any attached files herein contain information 
>that is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
>to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is 
>legally privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from 
>disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this 
>message is not the recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, 
>distribution, copying or other use or retention of this 
>communication or its substance is prohibited.
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to