Hi, Thanks for your reply. RFC 3325 its for trusted Domains, right? When I've made the question, I forgot to mentioned but my doubt was from a UA (non trusted) to a Proxy on trusted Domain.
I thing the RFC3324 answers my question since the Privacy-header solves my issue. I was having problems do to my SoftSwitch was rejecting my anonymous calls. I was not aware of Privacy-header. Since I activate this, the SS started to accept the anonymous calls. I was exchanging some mails with the SS vendor, and from what they say the P-Preferred-Identity was mandatory. This statement from the vender was according RFC3325, vendor opinion. My interpretation was different mainly due to RFC3324 says any identity form outside to a trusted domain MUST not be used. Rgds, JE -----Original Message----- From: Khairunnisa Hassanali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quarta-feira, 21 de Março de 2007 13:10 To: Jose Esteves Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous calls - the right behaviour Jose Esteves wrote: > Hello all, > > This is my first email to the mailing list. > I'm having a doubt related to SIP Anonymous calls. > What should be the correct behavior to follow? Which RFC I need to pay > attention? > What are the fields to use to route the call? > > Thanks, > Jose > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > Hi, You can refer to RFC 3325. Regards Nisha _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
