Jose Esteves wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for your reply.
> RFC 3325 its for trusted Domains, right?
>
> When I've made the question, I forgot to mentioned but my doubt was from a
> UA (non trusted) to a Proxy on trusted Domain.
>
> I thing the RFC3324 answers my question since the Privacy-header solves my
> issue.
> I was having problems do to my SoftSwitch was rejecting my anonymous calls.
> I was not aware of Privacy-header. Since I activate this, the SS started to
> accept the anonymous calls. I was exchanging some mails with the SS vendor,
> and from what they say the P-Preferred-Identity was mandatory. This
> statement from the vender was according RFC3325, vendor opinion.
> My interpretation was different mainly due to RFC3324 says any identity form
> outside to a trusted domain MUST not be used.
>
> Rgds,
> JE
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khairunnisa Hassanali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: quarta-feira, 21 de Março de 2007 13:10
> To: Jose Esteves
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous calls - the right behaviour
>
> Jose Esteves wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is my first email to the mailing list.
>> I'm having a doubt related to SIP Anonymous calls.
>> What should be the correct behavior to follow? Which RFC I need to pay
>> attention?
>> What are the fields to use to route the call?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jose
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>
>>
>>
> Hi,
> You can refer to RFC 3325.
> Regards
> Nisha
>
>
>
Hi,
To understand privacy totally you need to go through RFC 3323, 3324
and 3325. Yes, the trust domain concept is explained in detail in RFC 3324
Regards
Nisha
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
