2009/4/14 Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net>: > El Martes 14 Abril 2009, Paul Kyzivat escribió: >> I think you are missing that there can be multiple publishers of >> presence *about* Alice that are themselves *not* Alice. So: >> 1) they can't assert that the publish is from Alice, because it isn't >> 2) they can't address Alice's presence server because they may not >> know it. They just know presence info about alice. > > Ok, good points. But then, wouldn't make more sense to use the To URI?: > > Alice PUA Proxy Presence-Server > PUBLISH (1) -------------> > PUBLISH (2) ---> > > (1) > PUBLISH sip:presence-ser...@domain SIP/2.0 > From: sip:al...@domain > To: sip:al...@domain > > (2) > PUBLISH sip:presence-ser...@domain SIP/2.0 > From: sip:p...@domain > To: sip:al...@domain > > > How can be logical to use a RURI that doesn't point to the real destination? > as I explained before, if the target is the RURI then theproxy routing that > request mustbe presence aware (it must not route the PUBLISH based on the RURI > as a normal request).
Hi, more comments on it please? I think that my suggestion makes sense while the real specification seems strange according to normal SIP rules. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
