If I recall correctly... requests and 3xx-6xx responses are not retried; however 1xx-2xx responses expecting ACK or PRACK are retried.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Clauson > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Retransmits on reliable transports? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brett Tate [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, 20 June 2010 4:15 AM > > To: Aaron Clauson; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Retransmits on reliable transports? > > > > Your understanding is correct for rfc2543 but not rfc3261. As you > > noticed, rfc3261 doesn't always use the same retry rules over both > > reliable and non reliable transports. Although the rfc3261 appendix > > timer table can be misleading (especially concerning Timer G), it > does > > provide a good summation and reference for the letter timers. Draft- > > ietf-sipcore-invfix introduces more letter timers. > > I'm still a bit confused. With RFC3261 should retransmits be used over > reliable transports? > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
