=> SIP-over-SCTP (instead of TCP & UDP)
> -----Original Message----- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu > [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On > Behalf Of Attila Sipos > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Oktober 2010 13:02 > To: M. Ranganathan; Alex Balashov > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Stacks - large UDP messages > > >>Usually it is simpler to implement the following strategy: > >> > >> - If the message is below 64K, send the message using UDP. > >> - If the UDP transaction times out, try TCP transport. > > > Simple, yes. > > But bad also. > > Why do people want to use UDP for large messages? > It's a great way to block things up. > And on a lossy network the problems are exacerbated. > > Correct me if I'm wrong but if you have a fragmented UDP > message and one of the fragments is lost, then the whole > message has to be re-transmitted. > > Also, if there are 2 clients sending large UDP messages to > the same server aren't they likely to end up blocking eachother? > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
