2011/6/9 Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@cisco.com>:
> On 6/8/2011 3:50 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>> Some existing proxies reply some custom 4XX codes for these kind of
>> errors. I would like some specific and standarized 4XX response code,
>> something like:
>>
>>   467 "Unsupported Transport"
>
> Go for it! Submit a draft. (Send it to the dispatch list.)
> Put some text clearly explaining the problem and why existing mechanisms
> don't provide a solution. After that motivation, you can propose the
> solution.

Thanks Paul, I'll strongly consider doing it. Just a comment before:
wouldn't be 500/503 a suitable error code in this case? (however I do
know that 503 is "suitable" in too much cases...).



> I think such an error code would clearly apply to the transport=sctp case
> with a server that doesn't support sctp.
>
> It a little less clear for the sips over udp case. At the least there should
> be some text in the definition of the code that makes it apply to such
> cases. (And there is also the possibility that sips over udp should simply
> imply DTLS.)

You are right.


Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<i...@aliax.net>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to