> Just final doubt if in the INVITE request will have > "Request-Disposition: no-fork" then Call forwarding > will not happen for that request ?
As far I know, the UAC doesn't know what will happen. For instance, RFC 3841 section 9.1 indicates should instead of must. "When the caller specifies a directive, the server SHOULD honor that directive." If they chose to honor the "no-fork" directive, I'm not positive how the working group intended "proxy to only a single address" to be interpreted. I assume that it would allow call forwarding unconditional/busy. Similarly I'm not sure how the working group intended to apply "no-fork" to generation of 181 by the forwarding proxy when it would create an early dialog. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
