Thank you ! From: Kashif Husain <kashifhusai...@gmail.com> Sent: den 24 september 2019 00:04 To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] session refresh
And we can also respond with 200OK as mentioned in rfc3261 with no change in our sdp. "If the user is already a member of the session, and the session parameters contained in the session description have not changed, the UAS MAY silently accept the INVITE (that is, send a 2xx response without prompting the user)." On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 03:17 Kashif Husain, <kashifhusai...@gmail.com<mailto:kashifhusai...@gmail.com>> wrote: You can check for SDP version of re-Invite, if its same as previous one then its usually intended for session refresh. Thanks, -kashif On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 02:30 Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB), <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se<mailto:per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se>> wrote: Hi ! Can anybody help me find relevant RFC/other info on how UAS should handle re-INVITE that is intended as a session refresh and not for modifying the session ? SDP B1 in (3) is identical with SDP B1 in (5) Caller Callee | | | | |(1) INVITE with SDP A1 | |---------------------------->| | | | | |(2) Trying | |<----------------------------| | | | | |(3) 200 OK with SDP B1 | | |<----------------------------| | | | | |(4) ACK | |---------------------------->| | | | | |(5) (re)INVITE with SDP B1 | |<----------------------------| | | | | |(6) 200 OK with SDP ???? | |---------------------------->| Thanks ! BR/pj Sensitivity: Internal _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu<mailto:Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors Sensitivity: Internal _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
