At Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:35:12 -0500, Francois Audet wrote: > The intent is to be UNDISTINGUISHABLE. > > We do NOT want the equipment to automatically downgrade. We want > the user to make the decision in a concious way. > > Furthermore, we want to emphasise that the SIP and SIPS are > different addresses and are not interchangeable. > > Rohan Mahy, Jon Peterson, Eric Rescorla, > > Since you were the main people advocating this change, can > you make clear on the list what the rationale is.
Right. So, I want to avoid automatic downgrade. I think that at minimum that means that we should avoid using a return code ordinary associated with automatic retry. Better yet would be to use a hard failure return code and then a textual error message... -Ekr _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
