Francois Audet wrote:
In the interest of moving forward on this arcane issue of marginal
interest, I am making the
following concrete proposal.
. . .
OPTION 2
Use Response code 480, with 2 new Warning headera field 390
(SIPS Not Allowed)
and 391 (SIPS Required).
The proxy or UAS may use the warning text field to provide user,
e.g.:
Warning: 390 isi.edu "Please use a SIP URI"
Warning: 391 isi.edu "A secure SIPS URI is required"
In the interest of coming to a conclusion, please sign me up for option
2, but I'm willing to accept option 1 nearly as readily.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
