On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
THe general case for event packages is that they are asymmetric (unidirectional). It seems to be the infrequent case where it makes sense to support an event in both directions. So making bidirectionality the default seems wrong.
I agree. I didn't mean to suggest bidirectionality. I'm suggesting that all that is really needed is the ability to indicate willingness to receive. Each end offers what it is willing to receive, without saying anything about what it can send. It chooses what to send based on its private knowledge of what it can send intersected with the other sides offer to receive.
Is there really a use case that needs more than this? There may well be. I just don't know what it is yet.
-- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
