I wrote that text in the DTLS-SRTP framework document and when I wrote it I did not think about E.164 number usage.
As mentioned at the last meeting a bit more detail about the different use cases needs to be written. . I don't think that there is a lot (if any) benefit of using SIP Identity when the call comes from the PSTN. Ciao Hannes Dean Willis wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:50 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> I would instead not put the SIP Identity header there. >> No additional work needed. > > > Well, the problem is that you do apparently gain some benefit from the > presence of the Identity header when used with DTLS-SRTP. > > The DTLS-SRTP draft says: > >> The certificate fingerprints are sent in SDP over SIP as part of the >> offer/answer exchange. The SIP Identity mechanism [RFC4474] is used >> to provide integrity for the fingerprints. > > So, to the extent that fingerprint integrity is useful, RFC 4474 > identities are useful even when the assertion of identity is not strong. > > -- > Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
