Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Paul Kyzivat writes:
>
> > > > OK, so we have several different URIs, sip:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED];user=phone,
> > > > which are understood to be equivalent to tel:1234 and also to each
> > > > other
> > >
> > > this is not true.
> >
> > To what does "this" refer?
>
> i don't have access to rfcs, but since the number in sip uri user part
> is not a globally unique e.164 number (+...), it has no meaning without
> the domain, i.e., tel:1234 means nothing. there must be some tel uri
> rfc, where this is explained.
OK, if that is what you are objecting to. Agreed the example isn't a
valid tel. But it is equally invalid in sip.
I was overlooking that, assuming the point was simply to show some tel:
and corresponding sip, and wasn't about the precise form of the digits.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
