If if have a web page with sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone, and I click on it should result in my default SIP app to make a call to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Example.com may route it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. If I have a web page with tel:+12242 and I click on it, my default TELEPHONE app (which may not may not be SIP) should make a call to +12242. If my default voice app happens to be SIP, then it will send the request to my default outbound proxy. So, Juha is right, those 2 URIs are very different. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 09:46 > To: Juha Heinanen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it > > > > Juha Heinanen wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > OK, so we have several different URIs, > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone, > > > which are understood to be equivalent to tel:1234 and > also to each > > > other > > > > this is not true. > > To what does "this" refer? > > You are correct that these URIs aren't equivalent. But I > think Dale is right that they are often "understood" to be > equivalent, at least to the extent that SBCs feel free to > translate among them at will, and phones feel free to display > the number parts without regard for the domain part. > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
