Well, you can still do video over PSTN with H.320. I still view this as "telephony".
Not sure I understand the question. ---- François AUDET, Nortel Networks mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dan Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 09-Apr-08 7:46 PM To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) Cc: [email protected]; 'Paul Kyzivat'; 'Juha Heinanen' Subject: RE: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it [resending with a correction; I had intended to say 'over the PSTN' (not 'over the Internet'). What if I am trying to do video -- which cannot be done over the PSTN (unless you are insane and enjoy video delivered over an ISDN line, naturally). -d > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Francois Audet > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:55 PM > To: Paul Kyzivat; Juha Heinanen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it > > If if have a web page with sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone, > and I click on > it should result in my default SIP app to make a call to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Example.com may route it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. > > If I have a web page with tel:+12242 and I click on it, my default > TELEPHONE app (which may not may not be SIP) should make a call to > +12242. If my default voice app happens to be SIP, then it will > send the request to my default outbound proxy. > > So, Juha is right, those 2 URIs are very different. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 09:46 > > To: Juha Heinanen > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it > > > > > > > > Juha Heinanen wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > > OK, so we have several different URIs, > > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone, > > > > which are understood to be equivalent to tel:1234 and > > also to each > > > > other > > > > > > this is not true. > > > > To what does "this" refer? > > > > You are correct that these URIs aren't equivalent. But I > > think Dale is right that they are often "understood" to be > > equivalent, at least to the extent that SBCs feel free to > > translate among them at will, and phones feel free to display > > the number parts without regard for the domain part. > > > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
