On Apr 20, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > > Dean Willis wrote: >> On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:27 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: >>> 302s recursed by intermediate proxies may be perfectly reasonably in >>> certain charging environments. >> Not if they're retargeting. I'd also say that proxy operations >> that retarget are also generally unreasonable, given that (so far) >> we have no way to inform the caller of the retargeting. > > What is your objection? Is it > - that the caller may be billed for something he wasn't expecting? > - that the caller may not want to talk to the new target?
Both, although my bigger concern is the general unanticipated respondent problem. > The former is a billing issue, which may or may not be related to > this discussion, as Keith has pointed out. > > The latter can be dealt with via called party identity. Which, with current specs, only kicks in AFTER the INVITE transaction has completed. > In any case it is quite within the normal range of expectation to > day that you may end up talking to someone other than who you > thought you were calling. That's probably true, but it's not a good thing. Why do we keep trying to reinvent the failings of the pSTN? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
