Dean Willis wrote:
> Proxies that recurse on 302 responses should be taken out and burned
> anyhow. It's just a tragically stupid thing to do in most cases. In
> the scenarios we're talking about, which probably involve a transition
> from a "no charge" IP call to a potentially very expensive (like, up
> to $25 a minute for some premium services) PSTN call, the user REALLY
> needs to be able to make a decision.
This doesn't bother me. If this happens I'm just going to refuse to pay
the bill, with the argument that "I never called that number". So this
is a feature.
IMO if a proxy was already forking, or prepared to fork, then recursing
on 3xx is not making things any worse.
Also, you are assuming that the recursion is happening in the calling
domain. It may well be happening in the called domain, which may want to
hide the 3xx response from the calling domain.
> So the limitation you've noted doesn't bother me at all.
Why should we need Supported:tel before tel can be used? Its already
supposed to be supported.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
