Hadriel Kaplan writes: > The draft should NOT recommend the UAC sends double-CRLF in such a > case, imo. It should not recommend anything. It's out of the scope > of the draft at that point.
fine if tcp ua is completely out of scope. it make no sense to introduce a new protocol function for the case where it is not needed. ua vendors have better things to do that implement useless rfcs. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
