Christer Holmberg writes: > >proxy NEVER needs to "provide" anything for tcp ua's nat problem. > >as i wrote already, if tcp ua is behind nat it simply sends CRLFs or > >(if it is not able to send CRLFs) uses short enough registration > >interval.
> Where is that standardized? Is that how all UAs work? IF so, we can > remove it... christer, UA vendors have read outbound draft and figured it out that sending CRLFs is a good thing to do for tcp UAs and have ignored the rest if outbound as crap. if you want to formalize sending of CRLFs in your draft, then please do it. what we are opposing is the keep protocol that is totally unnecessary for tcp UAs. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
