Hi Juha,
comments inline.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Victor Pascual Ávila writes:
>
>  > I'd really appreciate if you could share it with us.
>
> i don't remember the details.  the idea was very simple:
>
> - UAS receives a call from sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - UAS sends a query (INFO, OPTIONS, whatever) to sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
>  includes in it relevant info about the request (call-id, from uri,
>  from tag, date, to uri, ...)

In derive, this query is a SUBSCRIBE request

> - when sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] UA receives the query, it replies with 200 ok if 
> this
>  UA is currently making the call in question

A 200 response to the subscription indicates the Caller's awareness of
the dialog
being monitored by the Callee. Otherwise (when the Caller is not aware
of the subscribed dialog) this subscription won't be accepted.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i did my proposal before presence was invented and it is still way
> simpler, less messages, and lower delay.

Concerning to the "lower delay", were you using any timer other than
Timer F (64*T1)?


Thanks for your comments,
-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to