On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
I agree with John too. I don't see the benefit. It would be
beneficial to have one for a specific package, for example dtmf,
maybe, but not the mechanism. It's like having an option tag to
support the Allow/Accept/Supported headers, as opposed to their
values. This draft is basically just a negotiation mechanism and
defining how to handle things - not the things themselves.
We'll still have the method name "INFO" for the Allow header, if you
want to say you can't do INFO requests.
If you need to do some generic non-standards track info-package, how
do you quickly weed out all the old phones that don't do info-packages
at all?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
