This is a corner case. If you require info-packages to make a call work, it sounds to me that whatever you are sending in the info is not appropriate for info and ought to be separate stream described in the SDP.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Willis Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 2:51 PM To: Hadriel Kaplan Cc: SIP List Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > All we have to do for vendor-proprietary users of INFO is make sure > they interoperate with those of us who don't have them, by letting > them discover we don't support them. (which is what recv-info does) > We don't need to work to give them more features. > But the caller can't get to the recv-info until it does an INVITE. I don't want to be getting INVITES for calls that are going to have to be dropped because I don't do info-packages at all. . . -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
