I agree. John
> -----Original Message----- > From: Shida Schubert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 07 January 2009 10:43 > To: [email protected] List > Cc: Elwell, John; Drage, Keith (Keith) > Subject: BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy > > > At the last meeting, Keith asked the group to provide feedback on > whether the draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy addressing the milestone > "Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy" should proceed as BCP or > as an informational. > > As a co-author of the draft, my inclination is to go informational. > > Reason is because the 2 specifications the draft requires, namely > GRUU and TURN aren't widely deployed, and neither are RFCs > (Although GRUU I believe is pretty close.). > > Despite the fact that people I talked to are keen on implementing > these specifications, I don't think the draft which requires and > depends on specifications that aren't widely deployed neither RFC > should be proceeded as a Best Current Practice.. > > Regards > Shida > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
