I agree as well. Informational is a good choice. BCP would be quite far fetched.
>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of ext Elwell, John >Sent: 07 January, 2009 13:12 >To: Shida Schubert; [email protected] >Cc: Drage, Keith (Keith) >Subject: Re: [Sip] BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA >initiated privacy > >I agree. > >John > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shida Schubert [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 07 January 2009 10:43 >> To: [email protected] List >> Cc: Elwell, John; Drage, Keith (Keith) >> Subject: BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy >> >> >> At the last meeting, Keith asked the group to provide feedback on >> whether the draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy addressing the milestone >> "Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy" should proceed as BCP or as an >> informational. >> >> As a co-author of the draft, my inclination is to go informational. >> >> Reason is because the 2 specifications the draft requires, namely >> GRUU and TURN aren't widely deployed, and neither are RFCs (Although >> GRUU I believe is pretty close.). >> >> Despite the fact that people I talked to are keen on implementing >> these specifications, I don't think the draft which requires and >> depends on specifications that aren't widely deployed neither RFC >> should be proceeded as a Best Current Practice.. >> >> Regards >> Shida >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >[email protected] for questions on current sip >Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
