I agree.
-Jonathan R.
Shida Schubert wrote:
At the last meeting, Keith asked the group to provide feedback on
whether the draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy addressing the milestone
"Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy" should proceed as BCP or
as an informational.
As a co-author of the draft, my inclination is to go informational.
Reason is because the 2 specifications the draft requires, namely
GRUU and TURN aren't widely deployed, and neither are RFCs
(Although GRUU I believe is pretty close.).
Despite the fact that people I talked to are keen on implementing
these specifications, I don't think the draft which requires and
depends on specifications that aren't widely deployed neither RFC
should be proceeded as a Best Current Practice..
Regards
Shida
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South
Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[email protected]
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
