On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 16:37 -0400, Andy Spitzer wrote: > Woof! > > On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:11:12 -0400, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please add your thoughts to the above so we can discuss the issues involved. > > The best idea I've come across with regards to an on-demand recording > service, was to have a service that can accept a three-way call from a > phone. When a user wants to record a call, she "conferences" in the > recording service, as if it were a third party to the call. The phone > acts as the conference locus, and so does the mixing, and sends the > mixed audio of the other parties to the recording service, which does > nothing but record 'em. The details are in what happens to that > recording when done, which are not insignificant.
That is indeed an elegant solution for on-demand (simpler than the transfer-to-self-via-recorder that I proposed), but it wouldn't work for situations in which all calls to some address(es) need to be recorded from the beginning. -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.781.229.0533;ext=162 or sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sipXecs project coordinator - SIPfoundry http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipXecs CTO, Voice Solutions - Bluesocket Inc. http://www.bluesocket.com/ http://www.pingtel.com/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
