Re: [sipX-dev] Interop server:Processing the Require Header

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:30:48 -0700

Dale Worley wrote: 
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 18:00 +0530, Baslingappa Bhujang wrote:
  
I have done the test with Snom phones  and 
Snom phones PASS  the test with 420 bad extension response
    
However, I'm a little confused by the 3rd and 7th lines -- you should
get the same result whenever Counterpath is phone2.
  
      
Thanks for correcting me Dale  
Actually 3rd and 7th scenarios have PASSED
    

OK, so the summary is now:

Counterpath	passed
LG		failed	reported as XTRN-130
Polycom		failed	reported as XTRN-131
Snom		passed
  

Dale
I have tested scenarios with some more phones models and here is the updated summary
Counterpath	passed
LG		failed	reported as XTRN-210(This might be same as the issue XTRN-130)
Polycom		failed	reported as XTRN-211(This might be same as the issue XTRN-131)
Snom		passed
Grand stream    failed  reported as XTRN-212
Aastra          failed  reported as XTRN-213

Thanks,
Basling.

--
Regards,
Baslingappa.Bhujang
Jr. Software Engineer
Qantom Software Private Limited
72/1B, 2nd Floor, K.H. Plaza, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore-78
Phone : 26655216, Telefax : 26799269

 "Leadership ... the ability to see what no one else sees, to listen when others talk and the ability to be optimistic when others are pessimistic."
SQA partners for your products
 www.qantom.com 
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to