> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Thorley > Sent: August 13, 2008 3:28 AM
> Your understanding is correct in theory. In practice, the > config files for 2.x and 3.x firmware are close enough that > we can use the same velocity template to generate them. We > have different templates for 1.6 and 2.x because those files > had significant differences. We had this conversation many > times and did not come up with a great resolution... > it is confusing from both a developer perspective and an > administrator perspective to say 2.x when we really mean "all > versions greater than 1.6". I'd like to have support for 1.6 removed. Polycom firmware is up to 3.0.3 now, and 3.1 is soon to be released. Even grand-fathered 300/500 sets can run a "2.0" compatible version of firmware (2.1.3). If anyone can find a reason to keep 1.6 support, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll raise a JIRA to have it removed. Thanks. -Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
