I say get rid of it... just adds confusion.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sipx-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damian Krzeminski > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Polycom SoundPoint IP Config Files and sipXecs > > Paul Mossman wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin > > Thorley > >> Sent: August 13, 2008 3:28 AM > > > >> Your understanding is correct in theory. In practice, the > >> config files for 2.x and 3.x firmware are close enough that > >> we can use the same velocity template to generate them. We > >> have different templates for 1.6 and 2.x because those files > >> had significant differences. We had this conversation many > >> times and did not come up with a great resolution... > >> it is confusing from both a developer perspective and an > >> administrator perspective to say 2.x when we really mean "all > >> versions greater than 1.6". > > > > I'd like to have support for 1.6 removed. > [...] > > Me too - but you need to run it by the users list, not developers > list... > D. > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
