Damian, Thanks a lot. Creating an unmanaged gw with sipx own ip address worked. But this means, that rules are not processed from top to bottom, as stated in the wiki. And it is hard to understand which rule will be matched, since the administrator does not see if a rule is internal or external, and from my point of view, should not care about that ... Is it worth explaining this difference between external and internal rules in the wiki?
And one more idea (I'm not sure if it is good, but .. anyway) : How about automatic sorting of dialing rules? Internal before external, and more specific before more general? (manual reordering should be removed in this case). So that rule order on the screen will really correspond to matching order. It'll be easier to see where the call will go, when looking in the dial plan... I guess, that this may require changes in "matching engine"... Thanks again, Nikolay. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sipx-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damian Krzeminski > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:20 PM > To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] dial plan question > > Nikolay Kondratyev wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I'd like to have a default dialing rule, that will forward all unknown > > (not matched by other dialing rules) numbers to autoattendant. > > > > So. I created a custom dialing rule: > > > > Match numbers with empty prefix and any number of digits > > > > Dial 1000 (my autoattendant extention). > > > > I made this rule last in the list. > > > > > > > > But after activating the dial plan all calls go to AA, including calls, > > that previously were routed to sip-isdn gateway. > > > > Call to internal extensions behave as such: destination phone rings (one > > short ring) and then call is answered by AA. > > > > > > > > Looks like my new rule takes precedence over all other, in spite of this > > new rule is the last in the list. > > > > > > > > This leads me to the conclusion, that there is something that I don't > know. > > > > Could somebody please tell me if my idea should work at all? > > > > Is there a way to forward all unknown numbers to AA? > > > > Why this new rule takes precedence over all previous rules? > > > > > > Rules that are "internal" take precedence over "external" rules (the one > that require a gateway). Internally sipXconfig would generate two rules > files "mappingrules" and "fallbackrules". And if there is a match when > processing "mappingrules" then "fallbackrules" are not even looked at. > > We probably need a UI for custom rule screen that would allow explicitly > set the rule as 'internal' or 'external' (ie. send it to mapping or > fallback rules). > > Since we do not have it yet, you'd need to use some tricks. One trick - > not > sure if it's going to work but worth a try - is to add an unmanaged > gateway > that represents your system and add it to the custom rule that you defined. > > Another trick is to use manual overrides descibed here: > http://sipx- > wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Defining_SIP_URI_Mapping_Rules#Manual_Mapping_a > nd_Fallback_Rules > > D. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
