I would prefer a forum myself. The reason is I then only have to use one tool 
and web site to accomplish my tasks. With a list I use Gmane and or Google to 
search. A mail reader to read and reply. And another site to browse old 
messages. I think that is why for many other open source projects, that is the 
format they have migrated to. 
 
>From what I've seen, most "Linux users" seem to prefer lists, and most 
>"Windows users" prefer forums. While most of the devs would be lumped in the 
>first group, the second will make up a large majority of users if the project 
>is to expand and bring on new users. Many of the "Windows users" will be 
>unsofisticated and a hard time figuring out multiple tools. 
 
Forums offer the best of both worlds as many programs offer subscribing to 
particular forums or threads so you still get them in email. Also, the better 
forums also offer easy searching by Google provided they are set up correctly. 
Forwarding to Gmane would also keep that functionality.
 
As this project grows, it will become necessary to split the lists up further. 
Not all devs will want to see all the messages. This is quite easy to do with 
forums, but is limited with lists. I could elaborate on the problems here, but 
I'm sure eveyone can figure these out for themselves. You will need multiple 
moderators for one thing.
 
As for the Wiki, I still think it is the best resource for a "Manual". Perhpas 
bringing on more people to watch over the changes and moving to a "publish 
after moderation" scheme would see it flurish?

________________________________

From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org on behalf of Scott Lawrence
Sent: Mon 12/22/2008 10:27 AM
To: Matt White
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Interest in a Sipx Forum?




On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 08:42 -0500, Matt White wrote:
> I was wondering what the community feeling is towards a sipx forum?
> Specifically a users forums.  I think the developers prefer the
> mailing list.
>
> I know I find myself asking questions that have been asked many time
> before, and search mailing list is not as easy as a forum. And I often
> find answers to problems in Asterisk/Trix fourms simply becuase the
> issue ended up being phone related rather than sipx related.
>
> If there is interest from the community and maybe a blessing from
> Nortel (a mention on the sipx wiki and sip foundry page) then our
> company is willing to host the forums on our web servers.
>
> I would also need a few volunteers to help act as moderators, although I 
> think the Sipx community is fairly well behaved ;-)

While I personally don't find most forum implementations any easier to
use than a good list/wiki combination, I'm very much interested in input
from the community.

One thing I feel strongly about is that we should not have both - the
developers already have multiple places to look for what's going on, and
our responsiveness to each will be diminished if we add to that. 

My experience with most forum interfaces is that they are more
time-consuming to peruse and not really better to search than a list
(indeed, most are much less search-engine friendly than the archives of
our list are now).

I have been working on a plan to upgrade our project infrastructure, so
now is a good time to have the discussion.  I'll post something about
what we're going to do after New Years once we've worked out some of the
budget questions around it.

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users


_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to