On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:11 +0100, Damian Dowling wrote: > SipXconfig running on a single server I can understand, it makes > everything a lot simpler from a programming point of view. Although it > would be nice for load balancing reasons to allow users to access their > accounts via different servers.
That's a feature that's being looked at, but we don't have any firm plans yet. > However, I find storing the phone profiles only on the primary server > surprising. It would improve redundancy if the profiles were also stored > on the secondary server. Is this planned for the future? At present, the way most phones retrieve configuration information is too limited - there is no way to tell the phones "try one of the following redundant locations". However, that is a feature of a new Technical Recommendation on SIP User Agent Configuration that is being worked on in the SIP Forum [1]. The latest draft documents for that group are available [2]. I hope and believe that we will be able to include support for this new standard in sipXecs 4.2 (we already support a significant fraction of it). Whether or not users can leverage that depends on what phones support it (ask your phone vendors). [1] http://www.sipforum.org/content/view/311/253 [2] http://www.sipforum.org/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,66/Itemid,75/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
